Sir Robert Heath, lawyer and judge

Sir Robert Heath, lawyer and judge
Virginia Lawyers
Image by lisby1
Sir Robert Heath (1575–1649) was an English lawyer and judge.

He was educated at Tunbridge Wells grammar school, St John’s College, Cambridge from age 14 and Clifford’s Inn from age 17; and became a barrister of the Inner Temple in 1603.[1] He was an MP for the City of London in 1620, and became solicitor-general in 1621, when he was knighted. He was MP for East Grinstead in 1623 and 1625.

He served King Charles I of England as Attorney General, from 1625. He owed his appointment to the influence of the Duke of Buckingham. Despite a reputation as a shadowy, opaque figure, records show him able to argue shrewdly and independently in order to reduce problems for the Crown.[4]

He brought a 1625 case in the Exchequer Court for the High Peak lead miners against Francis Leke who claimed a tithe from them. Through the offices of Heath the tithe right was eventually transferred, in a possibly corrupt way, to Christian Cavendish, Countess of Devonshire. From 1629 he was taking an entrepreneurial interest in the lead mines of Derbyshire, engaging Sir Cornelius Vermuyden as partner in a major drainage operation at Wirksworth, at the ore-rich Dovegang Rake.[5]

He argued for the Crown in Darnel’s Case (the Five Knights’ Case) of 1627. The judges rejected his argument on absolute prerogative; and a scandal blighted his reputation the following year, when it was revealed, or alleged, by John Selden that he had interfered with the King’s Bench records (a felony), in order to promote the decision in the case to a binding precedent (an interpretation that has recently been disputed).[6][7] The agitation caused by the business was of major importance for the formulation of the Petition of Right.[8]

He notionally founded both North Carolina and South Carolina. He was on a commission to consider the tobacco trade with Virginia in 1627-8.[4] In 1629 he was awarded a patent for the Province of Carolina[9]; but in fact he made no settlements there.[10] The grant also mentioned the Bahamas, the beginning of their colonial history.

He became Chief Justice of the Court of Common Pleas in 1631. He lost this position, however, in September 1634. One theory why is that his religious stance had led him to oppose William Laud.[12] In religion he was a Calvinist and anti-Arminian; he had shown some leniency in the Star Chamber case against the iconoclast and extremist Henry Sherfield.[13] Another theory relates to corruption. On the other hand this is not accepted by Thomas G. Barnes, who argues that Heath with Robert Shilton had displeased the King, and on an old matter: plantations in Ulster and the obligations of the City of London in an agreement made under James I, as interpreted in a lax fashion by the law officers of the Crown (Heath as Attorney General, Shilton as Solicitor General). The matter surfaced in a Star Chamber case in mid-1634. The King dismissed Heath with conditions making sure he could not join the defence team in this case.[14]

Heath returned to his practice as a barrister. His reputation as pro-Puritan, anti-Laudian did him no harm with the Long Parliament when Charles brought him back as a judge, making him Lord Chief Justice.[15]

One of his cases as Lord Chief Justice during the First English Civil War led to his downfall. In 1642 he tried Captain Turpin, a blockade-runner, at Exeter. A year later, Sir John Berkeley, the royalist Governor of Exeter, carried out the death sentence on Turpin, as retaliation for the hanging of a Parliamentary commander who had defected to the King. Heath was impeached by Parliament for high treason in 1644. He fled England, and died in Calais.

Comments are closed.