CNN & Fox News Call Election for President Obama, Dick Morris Cries

–An overview of different networks calling the election for President Obama. –Reviewing the smugly overconfident Republican predictions before the election. –On the Bonus Show: Election coverage fail, professional cuddler, mom fined for 3-year-old’s urination, more… How do you get the Bonus Show? Become a member: If you liked this clip of The David Pakman Show, please do us a big favor and share it with your friends… and hit that “like” button! Become a Member Like Us on Facebook: Follow Us on Twitter: Get TDPS Gear: 24/7 Voicemail Line: (219)-2DAVIDP Subscribe to The David Pakman Show for more: Broadcast on November 7, 2012
Video Rating: 4 / 5

Would the cable networks have a dull night if Obama swept all the swing states on the Eastern Seaboard?

Question by Samian Quazi: Would the cable networks have a dull night if Obama swept all the swing states on the Eastern Seaboard?
Since the East Coast’s polls close first, and obviously we get those states’ results first, wouldn’t CNN and FOX News have to wrap things up early if Obama swept Florida, Virginia, and North Carolina?

Romney would have to give his concession speech by 8 PM and the cable networks would have a VERY dull night after 10 PM.

Best answer:

Answer by MIKE L
Chris Matthews would get a very big tingle in his leg if that happened.

What do you think? Answer below!

Michelle Obama at VCU to Announce National Initiative

First lady Michelle Obama visited Virginia Commonwealth University on Wednesday to announce an initiative of the country’s top medical colleges and universities to create a new generation of doctors, medical schools and research facilities to ensure that service men and women receive the medical care they deserve:
Video Rating: 5 / 5

Once Obama has won the prerequisite Eastern and Midwest states, will the networks call the election for him?

Question by sinkohiosink: Once Obama has won the prerequisite Eastern and Midwest states, will the networks call the election for him?
Once Obama has won all of John Kerry’s states from 2004, plus Iowa and Virginia, will the cable news networks call the election in his favor knowing that he will inevitably win Washington, Oregon, California and Hawaii?

Best answer:

Answer by Chipmonk
I wish you would understand that the talking heads are not running the country. Television is a form of mind control! Use your own head and review the issues. The news media has been very unfair to McCain. Obama spent millions of dollars to buy this election. Vote McCain

Give your answer to this question below!

Are a lot of voting machines flipping Obama votes to McCain?

Question by Paranormal I: Are a lot of voting machines flipping Obama votes to McCain?
As reported in West Virginia and Tennessee.

“Early Voting Sees Reports of Voter Intimidation, Machine Malfunctions
Early voting has begun, and problems are already emerging at the polls. In West Virginia, voters using touchscreen machines have claimed their votes were switched from Democrat to Republican.”

“Just days after reports that six early voters in at least two West Virginia counties claimed their votes were switched from Democrat to Republican, a couple in Nashville, Tennessee reported similar problems with paperless voting machines. In West Virginia, one voter said, “I hit Obama, and it switched to McCain. I am really concerned about that. If McCain wins, there was something wrong with the machines.”

In Tennessee, a filmmaker couple also had difficulties casting their vote for the Democratic candidate, the Brad Blog reports. They had to hit the Obama button several times before it actually registered, and in one case it momentarily flipped from Obama to Green Party candidate Cynthia McKinney. Patricia Earnhardt said, “The McKinney button was located five rows below the Obama button.” The couple in Nashville were using machines made by the same company as those in the counties in West Virginia—by Election Systems and Software.

Meanwhile, there are reports of long lines at early voting sites in several other states, including some counties in Texas, Florida, Nevada and New Mexico.”

How widespread are these kind of problems? Have you experienced this?

Best answer:

Answer by jimthesnowboarder
there having problems, even if some computers did it. it wouldnt be enough for a mccain victory anyways.

Give your answer to this question below!

Why is Pres Obama so afraid of asking real experts any questions about deep water drilling? Funny thing?

Question by Anton: Why is Pres Obama so afraid of asking real experts any questions about deep water drilling? Funny thing?
Liberals inspire me every minute.

Check this question:
Why are Republicans so afraid of my questions about deep water drilling?

Now lets check the facts, who is afraid of what :

All right, lib, lets listen to oil drilling experts… not
“Under my Administration, the days of science taking a back seat to ideology are over. . . To undermine scientific integrity is to undermine our democracy. . . I want to be sure that facts are driving scientific decisions, and not the other way around.”

—President Obama, April 27, 2009

The President has appointed a seven-person commission to take what he says will be an objective look at what caused the Gulf spill and the steps to make offshore drilling safe. But judging from the pedigree of his commissioners, we’re beginning to wonder if his real goal is to turn drilling into a partisan election issue.

Mr. Obama filled out his commission last week, and the news is that there’s neither an oil nor drilling expert in the bunch. Instead, he’s loaded up on politicians and environmental activists.

One co-chair is former Democratic Senator Bob Graham, who fought drilling off Florida throughout his career. The other is William Reilly, who ran the Environmental Protection Agency under President George H.W. Bush but is best known as a former president and former chairman of the World Wildlife Fund, one of the big environmental lobbies. The others:

• Donald Boesch, a University of Maryland “biological oceanographer,” who has opposed drilling off the Virginia coast and who argued that “the impacts of the oil and gas extraction industry . . . on Gulf Coast wetlands represent an environmental catastrophe of massive and underappreciated proportions.”

• Terry Garcia, an executive vice president at the National Geographic Society, who directed coastal programs in the Clinton Administration, in particular “recovery of endangered species, habitat conservation planning,” and “Clean Water Act implementation,” according to the White House press release.

• Fran Ulmer, Chancellor of the University of Alaska Anchorage, who is a member of the Aspen Institute’s Commission on Arctic Climate Change. She’s also on the board of the Union of Concerned Scientists, which opposes nuclear power and more offshore drilling and wants government policies “that reduce vehicle miles traveled” (i.e., driving in cars).

• Frances Beinecke, president of the Natural Resources Defense Council, who prior to her appointment blogged about the spill this way: “We can blame BP for the disaster and we should. We can blame lack of adequate government oversight for the disaster and we should. But in the end, we also must place blame where it originated: America’s addiction to oil.”

On at least five occasions since the accident, Ms. Beinecke has called for bans on offshore and Arctic drilling.

• Rounding out the panel is its lone member with an engineering background, Harvard’s Cherry A. Murray, though her specialties are physics and optics.

Whatever their other expertise, none of these worthies knows much if anything about petroleum engineering. Where is the expert on modern drilling techniques, or rig safety, or even blowout preventers?

The choice of men and women who are long opposed to more drilling suggests not a fair technical inquiry but an antidrilling political agenda. With the elections approaching and Democrats down in the polls, the White House is looking to change the subject from health care, the lack of jobs and runaway deficits. Could the plan be to try to wrap drilling around the necks of Republicans, arguing that it was years of GOP coziness with Big Oil that led to the spill?

White House Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel took this theme for a test drive on Sunday when he said that Republicans think “the aggrieved party here is BP, not the fisherman.” He added that this ought to remind Americans “what Republican governance is like.” The antidrilling commission could feed into this campaign narrative with a mid-September, pre-election report that blames the disaster on the industry and Bush-era regulators and recommends a ban on most offshore exploration. The media would duly salute, while Democrats could then take the handoff and force antidrilling votes on Capitol Hill.

Even as this commission moves forward, engineering experts across the country have agreed that there is no scientific reason for a blanket drilling ban. The Interior Department invited experts to consult on drilling practices, but as we wrote last week eight of them have since said their advice was distorted to justify the Administration’s six-month drilling moratorium.

Judging from that decision and now from Mr. Obama’s drilling commission, the days of “science taking a back seat to ideology” are ver

Best answer:

Answer by KLLYT
Too much text for someone so irrelevant.

Give your answer to this question below!